Back to Top

Transparent Peer Review

The Transparent Peer Review tag focuses on the practice of openly sharing reviewer identities, comments, and decisions in the research evaluation process. It promotes transparency, accountability, and trust within academic publishing by ensuring that both authors and reviewers are engaged in a clear and constructive dialogue. This tag explores the benefits and challenges of transparent peer review, including its role in reducing biases, improving feedback quality, and increasing the credibility of published work. It provides valuable insights for researchers, editors, and publishers looking to adopt or refine transparent peer review practices in their journals.

What steps should the Indian academic community take to ensure transparency and credibility in journal?

The sudden removal of the UGC CARE List creates a gap in structured academic publishing oversight. How can academic bodies, journal publishers, and researchers work together to establish a transparent, reliable, and universally accepted system for evaluating journals? Should there be collaborative efforts between Indian and international accreditation agencies? What...

0

Upvote

Does UGC scrape the USG CARE list for journals? Now what should be the parameters to choose journal for publication?

I would like to know if the UGC (University Grants Commission) scrapes the UGC CARE list for journals. Additionally, what key parameters or criteria should researchers and academics consider when selecting a journal for publication? Please address factors like journal reputation, indexing, impact factor, peer review process, and others that...

0

Upvote

Most Active

View All
tab-image
tab-image
tab-image
tab-image
tab-image
tab-image
tab-image
tab-image
tab-image