Reviewer Anonymity
#ReviewerAnonymity: Ensuring unbiased peer review is crucial for research integrity. This tag highlights the ongoing debate surrounding reviewer anonymity, its impact on publication bias, and the fairness of the peer-review process. Trending discussions involve open peer review models and the balance between anonymity and transparency. Academic studies explore the effectiveness of different anonymity levels and their influence on reviewer feedback quality. Expert insights delve into potential solutions and best practices for maintaining fairness while fostering collaboration. Join the conversation – share your experiences and contribute to shaping the future of scholarly evaluation.