How does Scholar9 handle reviewer anonymity in a transparent peer review system?
I'm curious about how Scholar9 manages reviewer anonymity while maintaining transparency. Can reviewers remain anonymous, or is their identity always disclosed? I want to understand the options available and how they affect the review process.
Managing Reviewer Anonymity in Scholar9’s Transparent Peer Review System
Scholar9 balances transparency with reviewer confidentiality by offering flexible anonymity options. This ensures that reviewers can choose their level of disclosure while maintaining the integrity and openness of the peer review process.
1. Reviewer Anonymity Options in Scholar9
2. How Scholar9 Ensures Fair and Secure Anonymity Management
Reviewer Choice: Reviewers can select their preferred anonymity level when accepting an assignment.
Editor Discretion: Editors can enforce specific anonymity settings based on journal policies.
Conflict of Interest Checks: Scholar9, integrated with OJSCloud, flags potential COIs to prevent biased reviews, regardless of anonymity status.
Enhances Accountability: Open reviews ensure reviewers provide well-reasoned, professional critiques.
Supports Reviewer Recognition: Those opting for transparency can link reviews to ORCID and Publons, gaining academic credit.
Conclusion
Scholar9 provides flexible anonymity options, allowing reviewers to choose their preferred level of disclosure while maintaining transparency and fairness. Integrated with OJSCloud, the system ensures an ethical, accountable, and efficient peer review process that benefits both authors and reviewers.