Back to Top

OJS peer review

OJS Peer Review refers to the peer-review process managed through Open Journal Systems (OJS), a widely used open-source journal management platform. OJS facilitates manuscript submission, editorial workflows, and reviewer coordination, ensuring a streamlined and transparent peer-review process. It supports single-blind, double-blind, and open peer review models, helping academic journals uphold research integrity and quality. Editors can assign reviewers, track revisions, and ensure fair evaluations, while authors benefit from structured feedback. OJS enhances accessibility, efficiency, and collaboration in scholarly publishing. Understanding OJS peer review is essential for editors, reviewers, and researchers engaging in high-quality, open-access publishing.

What are the technical requirements for implementing transparent peer review in OJS?

I need information on how to set up transparent peer review in Open Journal Systems (OJS), including plugins, DOI registration for reviews, and automated workflows. Recommendations for OJS service providers like OJSCloud would be useful.

0

Upvote

How can journals implement a transparent peer review process effectively?

I need step-by-step guidelines on how a journal can transition to a transparent peer review system, covering editorial policies, reviewer training, consent protocols, and technical implementation in OJS or other journal management systems.

0

Upvote

What are the best practices for configuring OJS for a peer-review process?

As peer review is crucial to academic journals, I’d like to know how to set up and streamline the peer-review process in OJS. What settings or configurations should I focus on to ensure efficient, transparent, and rigorous review workflows?

0

Upvote