Back to Top

review workflows

Review Workflows refer to the structured processes involved in evaluating academic manuscripts, ensuring quality, accuracy, and integrity in scholarly publishing. These workflows include initial editorial screening, peer review (single-blind, double-blind, or open review), revisions, final acceptance, and publication. Efficient review workflows enhance transparency, reduce biases, and maintain research credibility. Researchers, academicians, and journal editors benefit from understanding best practices, automation tools, and evolving trends in peer review management. This tag connects users to discussions on optimizing review processes, ethical considerations, and innovations like AI-assisted reviewing. Stay informed on strategies to improve efficiency and fairness in academic evaluations.

What are the best practices for configuring OJS for a peer-review process?

As peer review is crucial to academic journals, I’d like to know how to set up and streamline the peer-review process in OJS. What settings or configurations should I focus on to ensure efficient, transparent, and rigorous review workflows?

0

Upvote