Can reviewers remain anonymous in a Transparent Peer Review Platform?
I'm curious about the anonymity of reviewers in a Transparent Peer Review Platform. Can reviewers choose to remain anonymous, or is their identity always disclosed? I want to know how this aspect is handled.
Yes, reviewers can remain anonymous in a Transparent Peer Review Platform, depending on the policies of the journal or platform in use. Transparency does not always mean full disclosure of reviewer identities; rather, it refers to the openness of the review process. Below are the different approaches to handling reviewer anonymity in transparent peer review:
1. Options for Reviewer Anonymity
Full Anonymity – Some platforms allow reviewers to provide feedback while keeping their identities hidden from authors and the public.
Optional Disclosure – Reviewers can choose whether or not to reveal their identities when submitting their reviews.
Mandatory Disclosure – In some cases, journals require reviewer names to be published alongside the review reports to promote full transparency.
2. Common Practices in Transparent Peer Review
Open Reports, Anonymous Reviewers – Peer review reports are published, but reviewer identities remain hidden.
Open Reports, Identified Reviewers – Both the review reports and reviewer names are made public.
Hybrid Models – Some journals use a mix of both, allowing reviewers to decide whether they want their identities disclosed.
3. Platforms Supporting Reviewer Anonymity
Scholar9 and OJSCloud provide configurable settings, allowing journals to choose between fully open, partially open, or anonymous peer review processes.
Springer Nature and Wiley Journals offer transparent peer review where reviewers can decide whether to disclose their names.
4. Balancing Transparency and Confidentiality
Benefits of Reviewer Anonymity:
Encourages honest and unbiased feedback, especially in cases of critical reviews.
Protects early-career researchers from potential conflicts with senior authors.
Benefits of Reviewer Identity Disclosure:
Increases accountability and recognition for reviewers.
Helps build trust in the integrity of the peer review process.
Conclusion
In a Transparent Peer Review Platform, reviewers can often choose whether to remain anonymous or disclose their identity, depending on journal policies. Platforms like Scholar9 and OJSCloud offer flexible options to balance transparency with reviewer confidentiality, ensuring an ethical and fair peer review process.
True scholar network
