Back to Top

peer review challenges

Peer Review Challenges refer to the difficulties faced in the academic peer review process, impacting research integrity, efficiency, and fairness. Key issues include reviewer bias, delays due to reviewer shortages, lack of transparency, and fraudulent practices such as manipulated reviews or plagiarism. The increasing volume of submissions and the reproducibility crisis further complicate the process. Addressing these challenges through open peer review models, AI-assisted screening, and improved editorial workflows can enhance research quality and publication efficiency. Understanding and mitigating these issues is crucial for researchers, academicians, and journal editors to uphold the credibility of scholarly publishing.

Why is Transparent Peer Review Important for Reviewers & Editorial Team?

I want to understand why transparent peer review is important for reviewers and the editorial team in academic publishing. How does it benefit reviewers in terms of recognition, accountability, and professional growth? Does it help editors ensure fair and ethical review processes? Additionally, how does transparency impact the quality of...

0

Upvote

What challenges do EB-1 applicants face in using peer review as evidence of extraordinary ability?

What are the common issues or misconceptions EB-1 applicants face when using their peer review experience as evidence? How can I avoid potential pitfalls in documenting this aspect?

0

Upvote