What role do authors play in a Transparent Peer Review Platform?

Role of Authors in a Transparent Peer Review Platform

Authors play a crucial role in a Transparent Peer Review Platform, ensuring the integrity, quality, and credibility of scholarly publications. Their responsibilities and involvement include:

1. Submission of Manuscript

• Authors prepare and submit their research manuscript, ensuring adherence to journal guidelines.
• They provide necessary metadata, abstracts, and supplementary materials.

2. Engagement in the Review Process

• In a transparent peer review system, authors can often view reviewer comments and, in some cases, the identities of reviewers.
• They are responsible for addressing feedback constructively and revising their manuscript accordingly.
• Authors may have the opportunity to respond to reviewers, fostering open academic discussions.

3. Ethical Compliance

• They must uphold ethical publishing standards, including proper citation, plagiarism avoidance, and data transparency.
• Any conflicts of interest should be disclosed to maintain the integrity of the review process.

4. Interaction with Editors and Reviewers

• Authors may participate in discussions with editors to clarify reviewer feedback and justify their revisions.
• In some cases, authors can suggest potential reviewers, provided there is no conflict of interest.

5. Visibility of Review Reports

• Depending on the platform, authors' responses to reviewer comments may be publicly accessible, adding accountability to the review process.
• They may choose to endorse the publication of their peer review history, making the review process more open and credible.

6. Adoption of Advanced Peer Review Platforms

Platforms like Scholar9 and OJSCloud provide authors with an advanced, transparent peer review environment. These platforms enable seamless manuscript submission, structured communication with reviewers, and better compliance with open-access policies.

In summary, authors in a Transparent Peer Review Platform are actively involved in the review process by engaging with feedback, ensuring ethical research practices, and contributing to a more open scholarly communication system.