Back to Top

academic peer review

#AcademicPeerReview: The cornerstone of scholarly integrity. This tag encompasses the crucial process of evaluating research manuscripts by subject-matter experts, ensuring quality, rigor, and validity. It's central to trending discussions on publication bias, reproducibility, and open science. Academic peer review informs academic studies on publishing practices and influences expert insights on research ethics and credibility. Researchers, academicians, and students benefit from understanding its mechanics and implications. Join the conversation and share your experiences and perspectives using #AcademicPeerReview. Contribute to a stronger, more transparent research ecosystem.

How can journals encourage peer reviewers to participate in transparent peer review?

I need strategies to motivate reviewers to support transparent peer review, including incentives, reviewer recognition (Publons, ORCID integration), and training programs.

0

Upvote