Back to Top

Paper Title

Intimate partner aggression—what have we learned? Comment on Archer (2000)

Keywords

  • Intimate Partner Aggression
  • Meta-Analysis Limitations
  • Conceptual Dichotomy
  • Aggression Definition
  • Methodological Concerns
  • Contextual Factors
  • Injury Outcomes
  • Scaling Issues
  • Sampling Bias
  • Policy Implications
  • Violence Against Women
  • Research Critique
  • Data Interpretation
  • Measurement Issues
  • Societal Impact
  • Gender-Based Violence
  • Scientific Rigor

Article Type

Research Article

Research Impact Tools

Issue

Volume : 126 | Issue : 5 | Page No : 690–696

Published On

February, 2000

Downloads

Abstract

This commentary on J. Archer (see record 2000-15524-001) identifies limitations at the level of the primary data, the formal meta-analysis, and the interpretations of the results. Highlighted are concerns with the conceptual dichotomy that is the foundation of the analysis, how aggression was conceptualized and defined, and the methodological problems in the studies included in the database that were not neutralized by the meta-analysis. These include inadequate measurement of contextual factors and injury outcomes, scaling issues, and sampling concerns. The authors question the degree to which the field is advanced by this meta-analysis when the results are placed in the context of these limitations. Following American Association for the Advancement of Science directives (I. Lerch, 1999), the authors believe that inadequate attention was paid to the policy implications of the conclusions raising the potential to undermine societal efforts to eradicate violence against women. (APA PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

View more >>

Uploded Document Preview