Nimeshkumar Patel Reviewer
Approved
Relevance and Originality
The topic is relevant to current work in predictive analytics and supply chain management. Comparing several machine learning models is useful, although the specific research contribution and novelty should be stated more clearly.
Methodology
The overall workflow is understandable, covering preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, training, and evaluation. However, the actual dataset source, dataset size, feature details, and model configuration require greater explanation to support reproducibility.
Validity and Reliability
The use of MAE, RMSE, MSE, MAPE, and R² provides a reasonable evaluation basis. More information on validation procedures and data characteristics would strengthen confidence in the reported performance.
Clarity and Structure
The paper follows a logical sequence, but several sections repeat similar explanations. Some terminology and formatting should also be standardized, particularly model names and section presentation.
Results and Analysis
The reported results identify Boosting as the strongest model, with MAE of 260 and MAPE of 4.92%. The discussion would benefit from deeper comparison with previous forecasting studies and clearer explanation of why the model performed better.

Nimeshkumar Patel Reviewer