Nimeshkumar Patel Reviewer
Approved
Relevance and Originality
The paper addresses an important and timely issue concerning the balance between tourism development and cultural authenticity in a heritage rich province. The integration of well established theoretical perspectives provides a meaningful academic foundation. The focus on a localized Philippine context adds value to existing tourism literature, particularly in relation to sustainable heritage preservation and community based tourism dynamics. The study demonstrates relevance to both academic discourse and policy oriented tourism planning.
Methodology
The study adopts a quantitative descriptive design with structured data collection from both residents and tourists. The use of purposive sampling is appropriate given the contextual focus, although clearer justification for sample adequacy would strengthen methodological rigor. The use of a validated questionnaire and statistical tools is appropriate for the objectives. However, additional clarity on instrument development and validation procedures would improve reproducibility and transparency.
Validity and Reliability
The study reports acceptable internal consistency, which supports reliability of the instrument. The inclusion of both local and tourist perspectives enhances data credibility. However, the relatively small sample size may limit generalizability of the findings. Potential response bias and contextual subjectivity should be acknowledged more explicitly, particularly given the perception based nature of the study.
Clarity and Structure
The manuscript is generally well organized with logical progression from theory to findings. The writing is clear and academically appropriate, though certain sections are overly detailed and could be more concise. Tables are useful in presenting results, but interpretation occasionally repeats information already evident in the data presentation.
Results and Analysis
The analysis is grounded in relevant theoretical frameworks and provides meaningful interpretation of findings. The discussion effectively links results to existing literature. However, deeper comparative analysis with similar tourism destinations would strengthen the analytical depth. The implications for sustainable tourism are well stated but could benefit from sharper prioritization of key actionable insights.

Nimeshkumar Patel Reviewer