I’ve noticed that journals can use different types of peer review methods, such as single-blind, double-blind, or open peer review. Can someone explain the differences between these methods? How do they impact the review process and the final decision on whether a paper gets published? I’d like to understand which process might be more suitable or common for different fields.
We use your skills and expertise to show you relevant questions. You can edit your skills and expertise at any time.
No Skills Added