Are there any journals that use Transparent Peer Review Platforms?
I'm looking for examples of journals that have adopted Transparent Peer Review Platforms. Which journals are known for using this system, and what has been their experience with it?
Several academic journals have adopted Transparent Peer Review Platforms to enhance openness and accountability in the publication process. Notable examples include:
Nature and Nature-Branded Journals: In 2019-2020, Nature, along with seven other Nature-branded primary research journals and the Communications journals, implemented transparent peer review. This initiative allows the publication of peer review reports alongside articles, aiming to strengthen trust in the peer review process. springernature.com
SAGE Publications: SAGE offers transparent peer review on selected journals through the ScholarOne Transparent Peer Review Program. This model publishes exchanges between peer reviewers and authors alongside the final article, providing readers with insights into the review process. SAGE Publications+1wiley.com+1
Wiley Journals: Wiley launched a scalable approach to transparent peer review, starting with the journal Clinical Genetics. Authors have the option to publish peer reviewers’ reports, their responses, and the editor’s decision letters alongside their articles, enhancing transparency and accountability. wiley.com
AoB Plants: This open-access journal utilizes double-blind peer review and emphasizes transparency by basing publication decisions solely on rigor, clarity, and substance. It aims to eliminate biases that affect much of scientific publishing. en.wikipedia.org
SciPost Journals: SciPost operates a suite of open-access journals across various scientific disciplines. Their peer-witnessed refereeing process makes referee reports publicly visible, and referees can choose to disclose their identities, promoting transparency in peer review. en.wikipedia.org
Experiences with Transparent Peer Review:
Enhanced Trust: Journals adopting transparent peer review have observed increased trust in the peer review process, as the openness allows readers to assess the quality and robustness of the reviews. sagepub.com
Reviewer Accountability: Making reviewer reports public encourages reviewers to provide more constructive and thorough feedback, knowing their comments are openly accessible.
Educational Benefits: Transparent peer review serves as a valuable educational resource, offering insights into the review process for early-career researchers and the broader scientific community.
Incorporating transparent peer review practices reflects a shift towards greater openness in scholarly publishing, aiming to improve the quality and credibility of academic research.
True scholar network
