Back to Top

Paper Title

The Revised Sexual Experiences Survey Victimization Version (SES-V): Conceptualization, Modifications, Items and Scoring

Keywords

  • Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization (SES-V)
  • Sexual Exploitation
  • Non-Consensual Sexual Experiences
  • SES Revision
  • Freely Given Permission Standard
  • Gender Inclusivity
  • Sexual Orientation Inclusivity
  • Tactics-First Wording
  • Modularized Assessment
  • Technology-Facilitated Exploitation
  • Verbally Pressured Exploitation
  • Scoring Algorithm
  • Incident Description
  • Psychometric Comparison
  • Prevalence Data
  • Taxonomies of Sexual Exploitation
  • Multidisciplinary Collaboration
  • Severity Dimensions

Article Type

Research Article

Research Impact Tools

Issue

Volume : 61 | Issue : 6 | Page No : 839-867

Published On

July, 2024

Downloads

Abstract

The Sexual Experiences Survey [SES] is considered the gold standard measure of non-consensual sexual experiences. This article introduces a new victimization version [SES-V] developed by a multidisciplinary collaboration, the first revision since 2007. The 2024 SES-V is designed to measure the construct of sexual exploitation since the 14th birthday. Notable revisions are adoption of a freely given permission standard for non-consent, introduction of new tactics and acts, including made to perform or to penetrate another person’s body, tactics-first wording order, and emphasis on gender and sexual orientation inclusivity. The SES-V is modularized to allow whole or partial administration. Modules include Non-contact, Technology-facilitated, Illegal (largely penetrative), and Verbally pressured sexual exploitation. Tables provide item text, multiple scoring approaches, module follow-up, specific incident description and demographics. Future plans include developing a scoring algorithm based on weighting our hypothesized dimensions of sexual exploitation severity: invasiveness, pressure, and norm violation combined with frequency. This article is the first in a special issue on the SES-V. Subsequent articles focus on the taxonomies and literature that informed each module. The issue concludes with two empirical papers demonstrating the feasibility and validity of the SES-V: (1) psychometric comparison with the 2007 SES-SFV; and (2) prevalence data from a census-matched adult community sample.

View more >>