Skip to main content
Loading...
Scholar9 logo True scholar network
  • Login/Sign up
  • Scholar9
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Network Journals
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Scholars Journals
  • Login/Sign up
  • Back to Top

    Transparent Peer Review By Scholar9

    Decoding Postpartum Depression in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wall-Paper”

    Abstract

    Women’s oppression in the rigid patriarchal society was a common practice in the late 19th century. An explicit practice was involved when it came to restricting women from having their basic rights, such as gaining education, earning, having individuality, etc. These evil practices often ensured that they were prevented from being equal to men. Often in marriages, it was seen that for the husband, the wife was merely a commodity who was being used based on the needs of the husband. Since women were forced to inherit after marriage, they did not have any autonomy in the relationship. This paper discusses these patriarchal notions of the late 19th century and how the protagonist in “The Yellow Wall-Paper” was controlled accordingly. It also sheds light on postpartum depression that the protagonist encountered while being dominated by the rigid societal norms.

    User Profile
    User Profile
    User Profile
    User Profile
    User Profile

    Nimeshkumar Patel Reviewer

    badge Review Request Accepted

    Nimeshkumar Patel Reviewer

    badge Approved

    Relevance and Originality

    Methodology

    Validity & Reliability

    Clarity and Structure

    Results and Analysis

    Relevance and Originality

    The manuscript engages with a well known literary text while situating it within the framework of postpartum depression and patriarchal control. This intersection remains relevant in contemporary feminist literary discourse, and the paper attempts to connect historical literary representation with present day psychological understanding. However, the conceptual contribution appears somewhat familiar, as similar interpretations of the story have been widely discussed. The work would benefit from a clearer articulation of what distinguishes its perspective from existing scholarship.

    Methodology

    The study adopts a qualitative interpretative approach grounded in literary analysis. While the textual readings are generally consistent, the methodological framework is not explicitly outlined. There is limited discussion of the analytical lens, whether feminist theory, psychoanalytic interpretation, or interdisciplinary health humanities. Clarifying the analytical framework and its application would improve the rigor and reproducibility of the argument.

    Validity and Reliability

    The arguments are supported through selective textual references and secondary sources. The use of citations demonstrates engagement with prior work, yet the integration of these sources remains somewhat descriptive rather than critically evaluative. There is scope to strengthen the reliability of the claims by engaging more deeply with contrasting viewpoints and acknowledging potential interpretative limitations.

    Clarity and Structure

    The paper is generally readable and maintains a logical progression from introduction to conclusion. However, there are inconsistencies in capitalization, formatting, and sentence construction that affect the overall presentation. Some sections appear repetitive, particularly in reiterating the role of patriarchy. Refinement of language and tighter paragraph organization would significantly enhance clarity.

    Results and Analysis

    The analysis offers a coherent interpretation of the symbolic role of the wallpaper and its connection to the narrator’s mental state. The discussion successfully links literary symbolism with psychological distress, although the depth of analysis could be expanded. Greater engagement with alternative readings and a more critical comparison with existing literature would enrich the discussion and strengthen its scholarly impact.

    IJ Publication Publisher

    The submission presents a thematically relevant discussion situated at the intersection of literary studies and mental health discourse. The topic aligns with the journal’s scope, particularly in its engagement with gender studies and interdisciplinary interpretation. However, the overall contribution requires further strengthening to meet publication standards.

    Publisher

    User Profile

    IJ Publication

    Reviewers

    User Profile

    Nimeshkumar Patel

    User Profile

    Ramesh Krishna Mahimalur

    User Profile

    PRONOY CHOPRA

    User Profile

    Niranjan Reddy Rachamala

    User Profile

    Neelam Gupta

    More Detail

    User Profile

    Paper Category

    Psychology

    User Profile

    Journal Name

    JNRID - JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT

    User Profile

    p-ISSN

    User Profile

    e-ISSN

    2984-8687

    Subscribe us to get updated

    logo logo

    Scholar9 is aiming to empower the research community around the world with the help of technology & innovation. Scholar9 provides the required platform to Scholar for visibility & credibility.

    QUICKLINKS

    • What is Scholar9?
    • About Us
    • Mission Vision
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Blogs
    • FAQ

    CONTACT US

    • +91 82003 85143
    • hello@scholar9.com
    • www.scholar9.com

    © 2026 Sequence Research & Development Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    whatsapp