Go Back Research Article September, 1997

Writing Narrative Literature Reviews

Abstract

Narrative literature reviews serve a vital scientific function, but few resources help people learn to write them. As compared with empirical reports, literature reviews can tackle broader and more abstract questions, can engage in more post hoc theorizing without the danger of capitalizing on chance, can make a stronger case for a null-hypothesis conclusion, and can appreciate and use methodological diversity better. Also, literature reviews can draw any of 4 conclusions: The hypothesis is correct, it has not been conclusively established but is the currently best guess, it is false, or the evidence permits no conclusion. Common mistakes of authors of literature review manuscripts are described.

Keywords

Narrative Literature Reviews Scientific Writing Empirical Reports Post Hoc Theorizing Null-Hypothesis Conclusion Methodological Diversity Hypothesis Evaluation Evidence Interpretation Literature Review Mistakes Scientific Function Review Manuscripts Research Synthesis Writing Guidelines Academic Writing Scientific Literature
Document Preview
Download PDF
Details
Volume 1
Issue 3
Pages 311-320
ISSN 1939-1552
Impact Metrics