Back to Top
Go Back
Journal Photo for Review of General Psychology
Peer reviewed only Open Access

Review of General Psychology (RGP)

Publisher : American Psychological Association
Psychology
e-ISSN 1939-1552
p-ISSN 1089-2680
Issue Frequency Quarterly
Impact Factor 4.7
Est. Year 1997
Mobile 8003742721
Country United States
Language English
APC YES
Impact Factor Assignee Google Scholar
Email journals@apa.org

Journal Descriptions

Review of General Psychology (RGP) is the flagship journal of the Society for General Psychology and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, which is Division 1 of the American Psychological Association (APA). Consistent with the mission and vision of the Division, RGP aims to publish innovative and integrative scholarship across fields of scholarship within psychological science and, as well, connecting psychology to other scientific disciplines (e.g., the biological and medical sciences, sociology, anthropology, economics, education, social work, health and social policy, the physical and ecological sciences, and computer science, and engineering) or other scholarly fields (e.g., philosophy, theology, humanities, and the arts). RGP publishes theoretical, conceptual, and methodological articles as well as literature reviews (including meta-analyses). Thematic special issues of the journal are also considered for publication insofar as they are consistent with the aims and scope of the journal. The work published in RGP is intended to advance understanding of the holistic and dynamic coactions of human life, relations involving physiological/morphology functioning, human cognition, affect, behavior, social relationships, and interrelations with the sociocultural and physical ecology of behavior and development across life. In addition, submissions that advance understanding of the field of psychology itself and, especially, as a hub discipline within the ecology of all sciences are also published.

Review of General Psychology (RGP) is :-

  • International, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Refereed, Psychology , Online or Print , Quarterly Journal

  • UGC Approved, ISSN Approved: P-ISSN P-ISSN: 1089-2680, E-ISSN: 1939-1552, Established: 1997, Impact Factor: 4.7
  • Does Not Provide Crossref DOI
  • Not indexed in Scopus, WoS, DOAJ, PubMed, UGC CARE

Indexing

Publications of RGP

Roy F. Baumeister December, 2001
The greater power of bad events over good ones is found in everyday events, major life events (e.g., trauma), close relationship outcomes, social network patterns, interpersonal interactions...
Roy F. Baumeister September, 1997
Narrative literature reviews serve a vital scientific function, but few resources help people learn to write them. As compared with empirical reports, literature reviews can tackle broader a...
Roy F. Baumeister June, 2004
To complement views of gossip as essentially a means of gaining information about individuals, cementing social bonds, and engaging in indirect aggression, the authors propose that gossip se...
Roy F. Baumeister June, 2002
Four theories about cultural suppression of female sexuality are evaluated. Data are reviewed on cross-cultural differences in power and sex ratios, reactions to the sexual revolution, direc...
Roy F. Baumeister June, 1997
Patterns of human self-defeating or self-destructive behavior are examined in relation to several hypothesized causes. Threatened egotism appears to be a major, pervasive cause: Self-defeati...
Roy F. Baumeister March, 2016
In the present, the past is more knowable than the future—but people think far more about the future than the past. Both facts derive from the principle that the future can be changed wher...
Roy F. Baumeister March, 2002
Men's efforts to force women to engage in unwanted sexual activity can be explained by a combination of reactance theory and narcissism. Reactance theory suggests that deprivation of specifi...
Roy F. Baumeister December, 2016
Social networking sites offer new avenues for interpersonal communication that may enable people to build social capital. The meta-analyses reported in this paper evaluated the relationship ...