Paper Title

The Use of Propensity Scores for Nonrandomized Designs With Clustered Data

Keywords

  • Propensity Scores
  • Nonrandomized Designs
  • Clustered Data
  • Model Specifications
  • Single-Level Model
  • Fixed Effects Model
  • Random Effects Models
  • Conditioning
  • Bias Reduction
  • Confounding Variables
  • Simulation Study
  • Cluster-Level Analysis
  • Grade Retention
  • Achievement Test
  • Cluster Sizes

Article Type

Research Article

Research Impact Tools

publications
101
supporting
0
mentioning
139
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
101
0
139
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Issue

Volume : 46 | Issue : 3 | Page No : 514-543

Published On

June, 2011

Downloads

Abstract

In this article we propose several modeling choices to extend propensity score analysis to clustered data. We describe different possible model specifications for estimation of the propensity score: single-level model, fixed effects model, and two random effects models. We also consider both conditioning within clusters and conditioning across clusters. We examine the underlying assumptions of these modeling choices and the type of randomized experiment approximated by each approach. Using a simulation study, we compare the relative performance of these modeling and conditioning choices in reducing bias due to confounding variables at both the person and cluster levels. An applied example based on a study by Hughes, Chen, Thoemmes, and Kwok (2010) is provided in which the effect of retention in Grade 1 on passing an achievement test in Grade 3 is evaluated. We find that models that consider the clustered nature of the data both in estimation of the propensity score and conditioning on the propensity score performed best in our simulation study; however, other modeling choices also performed well. The applied example illustrates practical limitations of these models when cluster sizes are small.

View more >>

Uploded Document Preview