Paper Title

A test of sex differences in aggressive response to hypothetical conflict situations.

Authors

Profile picture of Stephanie A. Sanders
Stephanie A. Sanders
Profile picture of June Machover Reinisch
June Machover Reinisch

Keywords

  • Aggressive Response
  • Hypothetical Conflict Situations
  • Response Hierarchy (RH)
  • Physical Aggression
  • Verbal Aggression
  • Behavioral Responses
  • Sex Differences
  • Coping Strategies
  • Interpersonal Conflict
  • Retrospective Estimates
  • Adolescence
  • Aggression Measurement
  • Aggression Preferences
  • Aggression Gender Differences
  • Conflict Resolution
  • Aggression Assessment
  • College Students
  • Aggression Research
  • Aggressive Behavior
  • Aggression Studies
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Gender Comparison
  • Aggression and Coping

Journal

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology External link

Research Impact Tools

DOI

DOI Icon 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.1045

Publication Info

Volume: 50 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1045-1049

Published On

March, 1986

Downloads

CITATION
COPY LINK

Abstract

Administered the response hierarchy (RH), developed by A. D. Leifer and D. F. Roberts (1972) and revised by J. M. Reinisch (see record 1982-00859-001), to 289 male and 268 female college students. The RH provides a retrospective estimate of where physical and verbal aggression reside in an individual's hierarchy of possible behavioral responses to hypothetical conflict situations in adolescence. Results indicate that the RH consistently demonstrated sex differences among Ss in retrospectively reported preference for choosing physical aggression vs other coping strategies as a response to hypothetical interpersonal conflict situations of adolescence. (31 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

View more »