Skip to main content
Loading...
Scholar9 logo True scholar network
  • Login/Sign up
  • Scholar9
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Scholars Journals
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Scholars Journals
  • Login/Sign up
  • Back to Top

    Transparent Peer Review By Scholar9

    Cognitive Bias in AI: Identifying and Mitigating Human-Like Flaws in Algorithms

    Abstract

    Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being used more and more in crucial decision-making processes in a variety of industries, including criminal justice, banking, and healthcare. However, cognitive biases that frequently reflect human preconceptions found in the training data might affect AI models, leading to biased results that may even worsen societal inequality. This study explores the various forms of cognitive biases that may appear in AI systems, as well as their origins and their effects. The study discusses ways for recognizing and mitigating cognitive biases to encourage more egalitarian and transparent AI systems. It also illustrates the impact of cognitive biases on AI model performance through extensive statistical analysis.

    Reviewer Photo

    Rajas Paresh Kshirsagar Reviewer

    badge Review Request Accepted
    Reviewer Photo

    Rajas Paresh Kshirsagar Reviewer

    03 Oct 2024 11:45 AM

    badge Approved

    Relevance and Originality

    Methodology

    Validity & Reliability

    Clarity and Structure

    Results and Analysis

    Relevance and Originality

    The text addresses a highly relevant and pressing issue in the field of artificial intelligence—the impact of cognitive biases on decision-making processes in critical industries. By exploring how these biases can exacerbate societal inequalities, the study underscores the importance of developing fair and transparent AI systems. This focus on the origins and effects of cognitive biases in AI is original and necessary, as it highlights a significant challenge that must be addressed as AI technologies continue to be integrated into various sectors.


    Methodology

    While the text outlines the study’s objectives, it lacks specific details about the methodology used to explore cognitive biases in AI systems. Including information about the datasets analyzed, the statistical methods employed, and the criteria for selecting the AI models would enhance the rigor of the methodology. Additionally, discussing how the effectiveness of bias mitigation strategies was measured would provide clearer insights into the practical implications of the findings.


    Validity & Reliability

    The claims regarding the presence and impact of cognitive biases in AI models are valid and reflect current concerns in the field. However, the text would benefit from empirical evidence to support these claims, such as case studies or real-world examples illustrating how biases have affected AI performance in different industries. Providing data on the frequency and types of biases identified in various AI systems would strengthen the reliability of the assertions made.


    Clarity and Structure

    The text is generally clear, but a more structured approach would enhance readability. Organizing the content into distinct sections—such as "Introduction," "Types of Cognitive Biases," "Impact on AI Systems," "Mitigation Strategies," and "Conclusion"—would help guide the reader through the discussion. Additionally, defining key terms, such as "cognitive biases" and "egalitarian AI systems," would make the content more accessible to readers who may not be familiar with the topic.


    Result Analysis

    The analysis of cognitive biases in AI systems is insightful, emphasizing the need for strategies to recognize and mitigate these biases. However, the paper could expand on the specific statistical analyses conducted and the results obtained. Discussing the implications of these findings for AI development and deployment, particularly in sensitive areas like criminal justice and healthcare, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in creating fair AI systems. Furthermore, exploring future directions for research in this area could enrich the discussion and highlight the ongoing need for vigilance in AI ethics.

    Publisher Logo

    IJ Publication Publisher

    Thank you sir

    Publisher

    IJ Publication

    IJ Publication

    Reviewer

    Rajas Paresh

    Rajas Paresh Kshirsagar

    More Detail

    Category Icon

    Paper Category

    Computer Engineering

    Journal Icon

    Journal Name

    IJNRD - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT External Link

    Info Icon

    p-ISSN

    Info Icon

    e-ISSN

    2456-4184

    Subscribe us to get updated

    logo logo

    Scholar9 is aiming to empower the research community around the world with the help of technology & innovation. Scholar9 provides the required platform to Scholar for visibility & credibility.

    QUICKLINKS

    • What is Scholar9?
    • About Us
    • Mission Vision
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Blogs
    • FAQ

    CONTACT US

    • +91 82003 85143
    • hello@scholar9.com
    • www.scholar9.com

    © 2026 Sequence Research & Development Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    whatsapp