Skip to main content
Loading...
Scholar9 logo True scholar network
  • Login/Sign up
  • Scholar9
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Scholars Journals
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Scholars Journals
  • Login/Sign up
  • Back to Top

    Transparent Peer Review By Scholar9

    A Survey on Various Chatbots

    Abstract

    In today's fast-paced world, people constantly seek new information and more efficient learning methods. Traditional approaches, such as books, search engines, and online encyclopedias, can be both time-consuming and challenging. Chatbots offer a solution by providing instant answers across various sectors, including banking, retail, travel, healthcare, and education. These computer applications are designed to mimic real-world conversations, powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) technologies, allowing them to comprehend and respond to human language. Chatbots can perform tasks, provide information, and address queries with ease. This paper surveys several methodologies for chatbot implementation, including cutting-edge techniques like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Natural Language Generation (NLG), Supervised Machine Learning (SVM), Model Driven Engineering (MDE), Dialogue Management, Human-in-the-Loop (HITL), Audio-Frame Mean Expression (AFME), Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). These methodologies enable the development of chatbots with advanced natural language understanding and response capabilities. The objective of this paper is to review and compare various chatbot development approaches to identify the most suitable for specific applications. The study concludes that while multiple methodologies and algorithms can be used to implement a chatbot, each method has its strengths depending on the task requirements. The paper also presents evaluations of the methodologies' accuracies and provides suggestions for their application.

    Reviewer Photo

    Chandrasekhara (Samba) Mokkapati Reviewer

    badge Review Request Accepted
    Reviewer Photo

    Chandrasekhara (Samba) Mokkapati Reviewer

    25 Sep 2024 03:13 PM

    badge Approved

    Relevance and Originality

    Methodology

    Validity & Reliability

    Clarity and Structure

    Results and Analysis

    Relevance and Originality

    The topic of chatbots is highly relevant in today's digital landscape, addressing the increasing demand for efficient information retrieval and customer interaction across various sectors. The paper's focus on advanced methodologies demonstrates originality by exploring not just established techniques but also emerging ones, providing a comprehensive view of the field.


    Methodology

    The survey of chatbot implementation methodologies is commendable, covering a range of techniques including LSTM, NLG, and various machine learning approaches. However, the methodology could be enhanced by clarifying how these methodologies were selected for review. A systematic approach to evaluate their effectiveness, perhaps through criteria such as scalability, user satisfaction, and deployment ease, would add depth.


    Validity & Reliability

    The paper mentions evaluations of the methodologies’ accuracies, which is crucial for establishing reliability. It would be beneficial to include details about the datasets used for these evaluations, as well as the specific metrics employed (e.g., precision, recall, F1 score). This information would strengthen the paper's claims about the effectiveness of each method.


    Clarity and Structure

    The paper appears to be well-structured, but it could benefit from clearer headings and subheadings to delineate sections such as introduction, methodology, findings, and conclusions. This would enhance readability and allow readers to navigate the content more easily. Additionally, including visual aids, like flowcharts or comparison tables, would help illustrate the differences between methodologies.


    Result Analysis

    The conclusion that each methodology has its strengths is insightful, but the paper would be stronger with specific examples of which methods are best suited for particular applications. Providing case studies or scenarios where certain approaches excel would offer practical insights. Discussing limitations of the methodologies or potential challenges in implementation could also enrich the result analysis.

    Publisher Logo

    IJ Publication Publisher

    Done Sir

    Publisher

    IJ Publication

    IJ Publication

    Reviewer

    Chandrasekhara

    Chandrasekhara (Samba) Mokkapati

    More Detail

    Category Icon

    Paper Category

    Computer Engineering

    Journal Icon

    Journal Name

    IJCRT - International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts External Link

    Info Icon

    p-ISSN

    Info Icon

    e-ISSN

    2320-2882

    Subscribe us to get updated

    logo logo

    Scholar9 is aiming to empower the research community around the world with the help of technology & innovation. Scholar9 provides the required platform to Scholar for visibility & credibility.

    QUICKLINKS

    • What is Scholar9?
    • About Us
    • Mission Vision
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Blogs
    • FAQ

    CONTACT US

    • +91 82003 85143
    • hello@scholar9.com
    • www.scholar9.com

    © 2026 Sequence Research & Development Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    whatsapp