Geethanjali Sanikommu Reviewer
04 Apr 2025 11:02 PM

Methodology:
- Strengths:
- The methodology is comprehensive and well-structured, covering both quantitative and qualitative approaches.
- The mixed-methods design is appropriate for capturing a wide range of data and insights.
- The inclusion of performance benchmarking and qualitative interviews provides a balanced approach to data collection.
- Suggestions for Improvement:
- Sampling Methods: Provide more details on the criteria for selecting enterprises. Explain how stratified sampling was implemented and why it was chosen. This will enhance the transparency and reproducibility of the study.
- Data Collection: Clarify the process of primary data collection from performance tests. Specify the tools and techniques used for benchmarking AWS Redshift, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake. Additionally, detail the interview process, including the number of participants, their roles, and how they were selected.
Additional Comments:
- Methodological Rigor: Ensure that the methodology section clearly outlines the steps taken to ensure the reliability and validity of the data. This could include pilot testing of performance benchmarks, triangulation of qualitative data, and measures to mitigate bias in interviews.
- Visual Aids: Consider including flowcharts or diagrams to illustrate the research design and data collection process. This can help readers better understand the methodology at a glance.
- Limitations: A brief discussion of the limitations of the chosen methodology would provide a balanced perspective. For example, mention any potential biases in the sampling process or challenges in data collection.
Geethanjali Sanikommu Reviewer
04 Apr 2025 10:54 PM