Back to Top
Go Back
Journal Photo for African Journal of Applied Psychology
Peer reviewed only Open Access

African Journal of Applied Psychology (AJAP)

Publisher : Taylor and Francis Ltd
Psychology
e-ISSN 1815-5626
p-ISSN 1433-0237
Issue Frequency Bi-Monthly
Impact Factor 0.8
Est. Year 2006
Mobile 27216805330
Country South Africa
Language English
APC YES
Impact Factor Assignee Google Scholar
Email elias.mpofu@unt.edu

Journal Descriptions

The Journal of Psychology in Africa publishes original empirical research articles, research reviews, conceptual development articles and thematic issues. Manuscripts can be regular research reports, brief reports, and those that address topical professional issues, including case analysis reports. Book reviews and special announcements are accepted for publication. Specifically, manuscripts with the following qualities are encouraged: 1) Combine quantitative and qualitative data, 2) Take a systematic qualitative or ethnographic approach, 3) Use an original and creative methodological approach, 4) Address an important but overlooked topic, 5) Present new theoretical or conceptual ideas; and 6) Present innovative context sensitive applications. Manuscript for publication consideration should show an awareness of the cultural context of the research questions asked, the measures used, the results obtained, and interpretations proposed. Finally, the papers should be practical, based on local experience, and applicable to crucial efforts in key areas of psychology for development in African cultural heritage and international settings.

African Journal of Applied Psychology (AJAP) is :-

  • International, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Refereed, Psychology , Online or Print , Bi-Monthly Journal

  • UGC Approved, ISSN Approved: P-ISSN P-ISSN: 1433-0237, E-ISSN: 1815-5626, Established: 2006, Impact Factor: 0.8
  • Does Not Provide Crossref DOI
  • Not indexed in Scopus, WoS, DOAJ, PubMed, UGC CARE

Indexing

Publications of AJAP

Stephen G. West March, 1982
Reviews 55 studies in which self-evaluations of ability were compared with measures of performance to show a low mean validity coefficient (mean r = .29) with high variability (SD = ...