Back to Top

Paper Title

Why do people watch porn? Results from pornresearch. org

Keywords

  • porn consumption
  • porn audiences
  • porn addiction
  • media representation
  • cyberporn
  • pornography stigma
  • sexual media
  • porn stereotypes
  • male viewership
  • porn myths
  • porn harm
  • porn research
  • deviant sexuality
  • porn impact
  • porn and youth
  • porn studies
  • sexuality
  • politics

Article Type

Book review

Journal

Journal:New Views on Pornography: Sexuality, Politics, and the Law

Research Impact Tools

Issue

Volume : 14 | Page No : 277–296

Published On

April, 2015

Downloads

Abstract

As Henry Jenkins has argued, we know less about the audiences of pornog- raphy than “probably any other genre of popular entertainment.”1 Indeed, what little we do know often comes from representations in mainstream media where two stereotypes predominate. For example, in men’s magazines like Loaded or in films like American Pie,2 the porn consumer may be represented as “a normal bloke, having a bit of fun,” but elsewhere he (and it is usually a he) is more likely to be presented as “deviant, slightly suspect and prob- ably addicted.”3 The latter is part of a tradition of figuring those who engage with porn in negative ways as “pimply teenagers, furtive perverts in raincoats, and asocial compulsively masturbating misfits.”4 This tradition has little to say about actual audiences of porn, instead using figures of the porn user as ways of depicting the harm and danger associated with pornography. In the past, those figures have included a “falsely innocent adolescent female” and a “truly depraved adult male.”5 But the traumatized child and addicted adult male are currently the most frequently depicted figures of porn consumption. They provide the focus for much anxious press discussion of pornography, as in the well-known Time magazine’s reporting on “cyberporn” (1995).6 This featured illustrations of a pale, transfixed child and “a naked man, his arms and legs wrapped around a keyboard and computer monitor, seeming to dis- solve into the screen.” Time magazine’s visual connection between body and screen suggested that porn is unwholesome, overwhelming, and masturba- tory,7 a trope readily taken up in stories elsewhere.8 Consumers as victims of pornography are graphically depicted in the Josh McDowell Ministry’s video 1 Click Away,9 where men, women, and children are shown being assailed and controlled by grasping hands and the voiceover speaks of the disintegra- tion of the family as a result of consumption of porn leading to addiction.

View more >>

Uploded Document Preview