Paper Title
The Hidden Rape Victim: Personality, Attitudinal, and Situational Characteristics
Keywords
- hidden rape
- unreported sexual assault
- sexual violence
- sexual abuse
- consent
- trauma
- victim silence
- survivor support
- sexual assault underreporting
- rape culture
- psychological effects of rape
- sexual harassment
- sexual coercion
- intimate partner violence
- non-consensual sex
- victim blaming
- fear of reporting
- sexual trauma
- legal challenges in sexual assault cases
- societal perceptions of rape
- sexual violence prevention
- rape recovery
- intimate partner abuse
- sexual violence in relationships
- coercive control
- consent education
- sexual violence awareness
- bystander intervention
- hidden sexual violence
- sexual exploitation
- sexual assault statistics
- trauma-informed care
- healing from rape
- social stigma
- reporting barriers
- legal rights for survivors
Journal
Research Impact Tools
Publication Info
Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 193–212
Published On
June, 1985
Downloads
Abstract
A hidden rape victim is one who has never reported her experience to a rape crisis center or to police. It has been estimated that only 10–50% of the rapes that actually occur are ever reported to authorities. Since most previous rape studies have selected samples from official sources, hidden victims have been overlooked. The goals of the present study were to describe the victimization experienced by hidden victims and to determine whether any psychological variables were related to victimization status. The psychological variables examined included personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics relevant to the three major models of rape victimization: social control, victim precipitation, and situational blame. Subjects were 82 not sexually victimized, 37 low sexually victimized, 50 moderately victimized, and 62 highly sexually victimized women. Subjects completed questionnaires and participated in a one-to-one standardized interview. Data were analyzed via multivariate analysis of variance. Personality variables and attitudes did not differentiate the groups of women, while numerous situational variables did. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
View more »