Go Back Research Article August, 2017

Heterosexual Women’s Anal Sex Attitudes and Motivations: A Focus Group Study

Abstract

Focus group methods were used to explore heterosexual women’s receptive anal sex attitudes and motivations. Behaviors under investigation included penile–anal intercourse (PAI), manual–anal stimulation, oral–anal contact, and the use of sex toys. A total of 33 self-identified heterosexual women ages 18 to 30 recruited from two metropolitan areas in the Midwestern United States participated in one of six focus groups. The findings suggest that women viewed heterosexual anal sex as an emerging norm. Attitudes and motivations were complex and varied by behavior. Dominant themes included curiosity, pain, pleasure, and stigma. Relational factors, including acquiescence, coercion, and consent, were also salient among participants. Factors that influence anal sexual behaviors may not be entirely distinct from those that influence other sexual behaviors; however, factors that influence anal intercourse may be distinct from those that influence nonintercourse anal sex. Improved understanding will allow scientists to better understand the integration of anal sex behaviors into the broader sexual repertoire.

Keywords

Anal Sex Attitudes Penile–Anal Intercourse (PAI) Manual–Anal Stimulation Oral–Anal Contact Sex Toys Sexual Repertoire Consent Coercion Acquiescence Pain Pleasure Stigma Relational Factors Sexual Exploration Heterosexual Anal Sex BDSM Gagged Anal Sex Sexual Attitudes Sexual Motivations Curiosity Sexual Norms Sexual Behavior Integration Sexual Health Education Anal Sex Communication Sexual Exploration Influence of Stigma Non-traditional Sexual Practices Heterosexual Women’s Sexuality Receptive Anal Sex Risk Perception Intercourse Anal Sex Sexual Satisfaction Receptive Anal Intercourse Sexual Motivation Penile–Anal Intercourse Heterosexual Women Sexual Behavior Erotic Norms Fantasy Unsafe Sex Sex Position Role Play Kink Sexual Communication Relationship Dynamics Sadism
Details
Volume 56
Issue 3
Pages 367-377
ISSN 1559-8519
Impact Metrics