PRONOY CHOPRA Reviewer
02 Dec 2025 11:08 AM
Approved
1. Relevance and Originality
The paper addresses an important cultural and scientific challenge by exploring how advanced digital technologies can help preserve the auditory heritage of ancient performance spaces. This topic holds strong relevance because sound related cultural elements often receive less attention than visual artefacts. The interdisciplinary fusion of heritage science, acoustics, and artificial intelligence gives the study a distinctive identity, making its contribution original within both heritage and computational research domains.
2. Methodology
The authors describe an ambitious technical workflow that includes three dimensional models, acoustic simulations, and AI supported analyses. While this combination is appropriate and promising, the methodology section could be strengthened with clearer step by step explanation of how data were handled. Details about the selection of architectural sources, the modelling assumptions, and the way simulation accuracy was assessed would help readers better understand the approach. A brief outline of the computational pipeline would increase confidence in the overall design.
3. Validity and Reliability
The conceptual foundation of using AI to study sound propagation and resonance is convincing, yet the reliability of the outcomes depends greatly on the quality and precision of historical reconstructions. It would help if the authors included information on how uncertainties were managed. For instance, acknowledging limitations of incomplete architectural records or material estimates would demonstrate careful consideration of validity. Indicating whether predictive outputs were cross checked using reference cases or known acoustic principles would also enhance trust in the findings.
4. Clarity and Structure
The writing is generally smooth and offers a clear sense of purpose. However, some passages compress cultural motivations and technical descriptions into single sections, creating moments of density that may slow reader comprehension. Dividing major ideas more distinctly could produce a more fluid structure. A clearer separation between heritage context, simulation techniques, and AI reasoning would make the narrative easier to navigate while maintaining the richness of the content.
5. Results and Analysis
The paper emphasises the potential contributions of digital acoustics and AI to heritage preservation, but it would benefit from presenting specific examples that illustrate the effectiveness of these methods. Even one detailed case showing how reconstructed resonances or reverberation profiles compare with expected historical characteristics would add substantial depth. Highlighting such an example would give readers a stronger sense of the practical outcomes achieved by the project.
PRONOY CHOPRA Reviewer