Ramesh Krishna Mahimalur Reviewer
25 Nov 2025 01:34 PM
Approved
1. Relevance and Originality
The abstract focuses on the growing influence of generative AI in modern product development, a subject that is both important and widely discussed in contemporary research. Its comprehensive view of how AI reshapes ideation, planning, and organizational roles gives it strong thematic relevance. To enhance its originality, the abstract could briefly indicate how this study differs from other discussions on human and AI collaboration in product design.
2. Methodology
While the abstract outlines several areas where AI contributes to development processes, it does not clarify the method used to derive these insights. Without knowing whether the study relies on conceptual reasoning, industry evaluation, comparative analysis, or another strategy, readers may find it difficult to judge the depth of the work. A short indication of the underlying research approach would improve the clarity of the study’s foundation.
3. Validity and Reliability
The capabilities described, such as automated documentation or user behavior prediction, are consistent with current advances in AI systems. However, the absence of any reference to data sources or validation steps makes it challenging to assess the strength of the conclusions. Noting whether the claims stem from practical implementations, interviews, or literature assessment would help establish reliability.
4. Clarity and Structure
The abstract is rich in content, but several sentences contain many ideas in quick succession. The flow would be smoother if the transitions between technological aspects, teamwork changes, and organizational requirements were slightly more defined. By presenting these components in a more sequenced manner, the key messages would stand out more clearly for the reader.
5. Results and Analysis
Although the abstract identifies important themes such as workflow optimization and skill evolution, it does not mention any specific findings or illustrative outcomes. Including a short indication of what the study discovered or demonstrated would make the contribution more tangible. Even a single summarized insight would help showcase the practical or theoretical value of the research.
Ramesh Krishna Mahimalur Reviewer