PRONOY CHOPRA Reviewer
25 Nov 2025 01:36 PM
Approved
1. Relevance and Originality
The abstract addresses an increasingly important topic as generative AI continues to reshape product development in many industries. The broad examination of how AI influences ideation, prototyping, testing, and team coordination makes the subject highly relevant. To further emphasize originality, the abstract could identify one specific perspective or insight that sets this work apart from existing discussions on AI enabled development practices.
2. Methodology
Although the abstract covers a wide range of concepts, it does not specify how these observations were gathered or analyzed. Readers may struggle to understand whether the work is grounded in empirical study, conceptual synthesis, or industry experience. A brief methodological reference would give the research greater structure and help clarify its academic grounding.
3. Validity and Reliability
The claims about AI supported functions such as requirement generation, test case creation, and workflow automation appear consistent with current advancements, but the reliability of these conclusions cannot be evaluated without information on the evidence base. A short mention of sources, evaluation criteria, or analytical tools would improve confidence in the assertions included in the abstract.
4. Clarity and Structure
The abstract is informative, but it contains dense passages that merge several ideas into single statements. A slightly more refined structure that separates technological capabilities from organizational implications would enhance readability. Simplifying the sequencing of ideas would allow the main themes to emerge more distinctly for the reader.
5. Results and Analysis
The abstract outlines the themes explored within the study but does not indicate any specific outputs or results. Including even a brief reference to insights gained, observed impacts, or notable patterns would make the analytical contribution of the paper clearer. Highlighting one meaningful finding would strengthen this section considerably.
PRONOY CHOPRA Reviewer