Transparent Peer Review By Scholar9
Industrial Relations at Enterprise Level: A Case Study
Abstract
Industrial relations in India have witnessed a long journey, from the phase of industrialisation to independence era to the age of economic reforms, but a lot needs to be addressed given the role of cordial industrial relations in desired economic growth of a country. The key lies in recognition of workforce as an essential and integral part of the organisation and not merely a tool for the production. The second National commission on labour recommended consolidation of labour laws, given that there are numerous labour laws both at the state level and the central level. Most of the labour laws are applicable to organisations employing a given number of workers, mostly ten or more workers. In order to escape the laws, organisations have been using contract labour more, so as to avoid the constraints of hiring and firing in adjusting to production demands. This study concentrates upon how the broad structure of specific patterns of industrial relations operates in a given context, and thereby provide an insight for solving a number of emerging problems. It helps to locate where the problem is, which may require modifications in the structural patterns. This provides an objective analysis to which those responsible for managing industrial relations in industry can relate their own experiences and can help them to seek avenues of change in realising their industrial relations objectives.
Darshan Patel Reviewer
19 Nov 2025 04:44 PM
Approved
Relevance & Originality
The paper addresses an area that remains important for both researchers and practitioners—industrial relations within Indian manufacturing units. The case-based approach is useful for understanding workplace realities. However, the manuscript relies heavily on established concepts and known industrial relations issues, which limits its novelty. The study would benefit from clearly identifying what makes this particular organisation or set of findings distinctive and how it contributes to contemporary debates on labour–management relations.
Methodology
The study employs a survey-based design supported by both descriptive and inferential statistics. While this structure is appropriate for examining organisational perceptions, several essential methodological details are missing. The sampling process is not explained, the basis for selecting departments and respondent categories is unclear, and no justification is provided for the sample size. The instruments used for data collection are not described in enough detail to evaluate their robustness. More clarity on how data were gathered, structured, and validated would significantly improve methodological soundness.
Validity & Reliability
Although various statistical tests are used, the manuscript provides no discussion of instrument reliability or any measures taken to ensure consistency in responses. The absence of information on pilot testing, internal reliability checks, or procedures to minimise response bias makes it difficult to judge the strength of the findings. Given that many results reflect subjective attitudes, potential distortions arising from organisational hierarchy or fear of repercussions should be addressed. Strengthening these aspects would enhance both validity and reliability.
Clarity & Structure
The paper contains substantial descriptive material, but the structure could be more coherent. The introduction includes extended background information that overshadows the research purpose. The results section is dominated by detailed tables that lack clear visual organisation, making them hard to interpret. Explanations of findings sometimes merge with anecdotal narrative, which affects academic clarity. A more concise introduction, cleaner data presentation, and a logically sequenced discussion would greatly improve the overall readability and impact of the manuscript.
IJ Publication Publisher
We sincerely thank the reviewer for the time and expertise invested in evaluating this manuscript. Your detailed observations, constructive suggestions, and careful assessment of each section are greatly appreciated. The insights you have provided will help both the authors and the editorial team strengthen the quality and clarity of the work. We value your contribution to maintaining the academic standards of the journal and thank you once again for your thoughtful review.
Darshan Patel Reviewer