Transparent Peer Review By Scholar9
Optimizing Code Reusability in Cross-Platform Mobile Development: Case Studies with Kotlin Multiplatform and Swift
Abstract
This research paper discusses the strategies for optimizing code reusability in cross-platform mobile development, focusing on Kotlin Multiplatform and Swift. The study examines the advantages and limitations of each framework, emphasizing real-world case studies that illustrate effective implementation. By analyzing various approaches to code sharing and modular design, this paper aims to provide practical insights for developers seeking to enhance their mobile application development processes.
Archit Joshi Reviewer
24 Oct 2024 10:28 AM
Not Approved
Relevance and Originality:
The research addresses an increasingly important topic in mobile development—optimizing code reusability in cross-platform applications. As businesses and developers strive to streamline app development across multiple platforms, the focus on Kotlin Multiplatform and Swift is highly relevant. The study contributes to the field by examining the strengths and weaknesses of each framework, though originality could be improved by exploring newer trends such as Flutter or React Native, which are also widely used for cross-platform development.
Methodology:
The methodology is well-constructed, particularly in its use of real-world case studies to illustrate practical implementation. The analysis of code sharing and modular design across Kotlin Multiplatform and Swift provides useful insights for developers. However, the paper could benefit from more detailed explanations of the criteria used to evaluate the effectiveness of code reusability, such as how much development time was saved or the impact on app performance. Expanding the range of case studies to include more diverse application types could offer a more comprehensive evaluation.
Validity & Reliability:
The findings seem valid, especially the comparison of Kotlin Multiplatform and Swift in terms of their effectiveness for code sharing and modular design. The paper provides balanced insights into the advantages and limitations of each framework, though reliability could be enhanced by including more empirical data from a broader set of use cases. Testing the frameworks across different project sizes, from small apps to large-scale enterprise solutions, would strengthen the study’s generalizability.
Clarity and Structure:
The research is clearly organized, with a logical structure that leads the reader from the concept of code reusability to the analysis of the two frameworks. The explanations are easy to follow, and the use of case studies adds clarity to the practical applications of the frameworks. However, the technical details of code sharing approaches could be made more concise to improve readability, as some sections are overly detailed and may distract from the core message.
Result Analysis:
The analysis provides practical insights into the strategies for enhancing code reusability through Kotlin Multiplatform and Swift. The discussion of modular design and code-sharing approaches is particularly strong, offering developers actionable strategies for optimizing cross-platform development. However, the analysis could be deepened by providing more quantitative metrics, such as the percentage of code reuse achieved or the reduction in development time. Including a comparison of the long-term maintenance costs of cross-platform solutions versus native development would further enrich the discussion.
IJ Publication Publisher
done sir
Archit Joshi Reviewer