Transparent Peer Review By Scholar9
Security Vulnerabilities in Android and iOS Apps: A Comparative Analysis of Threats and Mitigation Strategies
Abstract
As mobile applications become integral to daily life, securing them has become a critical concern for users and developers alike. This paper provides an in-depth comparative analysis of security vulnerabilities in Android and iOS apps. It explores common attack vectors such as malware, insecure data storage, improper authentication, and data leakage, while comparing the security models of both platforms. Finally, the paper proposes mitigation strategies that developers can implement to minimize vulnerabilities, and discusses best practices for secure app development.
Archit Joshi Reviewer
24 Oct 2024 10:26 AM
Approved
Relevance and Originality:
The research is highly relevant, given the increasing dependence on mobile applications in everyday life and the growing concerns around security. By comparing the security vulnerabilities in Android and iOS apps, the paper addresses a critical issue for both developers and users. The exploration of common attack vectors and security models of both platforms offers valuable insights, though originality could be improved by discussing emerging security threats, such as those related to AI integration or privacy concerns with newer technologies like biometrics.
Methodology:
The methodology appears solid, particularly in its comprehensive analysis of attack vectors such as malware, insecure data storage, and data leakage. The comparison of Android and iOS security models is well-structured, providing a clear basis for understanding the platforms' strengths and weaknesses. However, the methodology could be enhanced by including real-world case studies or specific examples of past security breaches. Additionally, offering more detailed information on how security vulnerabilities were tested or analyzed would improve the rigor of the study.
Validity & Reliability:
The paper provides valid conclusions about the differences in security models between Android and iOS. The identification of key vulnerabilities and the proposed mitigation strategies seem well-supported by the analysis. However, the reliability could be strengthened by offering more quantitative data, such as the number of vulnerabilities discovered across different app categories or over specific timeframes. Including empirical data or feedback from security audits would further support the findings and make them more generalizable across various app types.
Clarity and Structure:
The research article is well-organized, moving logically from identifying security vulnerabilities to comparing the security frameworks of Android and iOS, and finally offering mitigation strategies. The flow is clear, and the arguments are easy to follow. However, some sections, particularly those detailing technical security models, could be made more concise to enhance readability. Streamlining these explanations would ensure that the core message remains clear while maintaining technical depth.
Result Analysis:
The analysis of security vulnerabilities is insightful, especially in its identification of key attack vectors and how they differ between Android and iOS. The paper does well in proposing practical mitigation strategies, which are useful for developers looking to improve app security. However, the analysis could be strengthened by providing more actionable steps for developers or including a deeper discussion on the long-term implications of ignoring these vulnerabilities. Additionally, offering predictions on future security challenges or trends in mobile app security would add forward-looking value to the study.
IJ Publication Publisher
thankyou sir
Archit Joshi Reviewer