Skip to main content
Loading...
Scholar9 logo True scholar network
  • Login/Sign up
  • Scholar9
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Scholars Journals
    Publications ▼
    Article List Deposit Article
    Mentorship ▼
    Overview Sessions
    Q&A Institutions Scholars Journals
  • Login/Sign up
  • Back to Top

    Transparent Peer Review By Scholar9

    Cognitive Bias in AI: Identifying and Mitigating Human-Like Flaws in Algorithms

    Abstract

    Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being used more and more in crucial decision-making processes in a variety of industries, including criminal justice, banking, and healthcare. However, cognitive biases that frequently reflect human preconceptions found in the training data might affect AI models, leading to biased results that may even worsen societal inequality. This study explores the various forms of cognitive biases that may appear in AI systems, as well as their origins and their effects. The study discusses ways for recognizing and mitigating cognitive biases to encourage more egalitarian and transparent AI systems. It also illustrates the impact of cognitive biases on AI model performance through extensive statistical analysis.

    Reviewer Photo

    Phanindra Kumar Kankanampati Reviewer

    badge Review Request Accepted
    Reviewer Photo

    Phanindra Kumar Kankanampati Reviewer

    03 Oct 2024 11:58 AM

    badge Approved

    Relevance and Originality

    Methodology

    Validity & Reliability

    Clarity and Structure

    Results and Analysis

    Relevance and Originality

    The text addresses a crucial and timely issue: the impact of cognitive biases in AI technologies across various industries. Given the increasing reliance on AI for decision-making in sensitive areas like criminal justice and healthcare, exploring the origins and effects of these biases is both relevant and original. This study contributes to the growing discourse on ethical AI, highlighting the need for transparency and fairness in AI systems, which is essential in today's digital landscape.


    Methodology

    While the text outlines the exploration of cognitive biases and their mitigation, it lacks specific methodological details regarding how the study was conducted. Including information about the research design, data sources, and analytical methods used in the statistical analysis would strengthen the methodology. A clearer description of how biases were identified and measured would enhance the rigor of the study.


    Validity & Reliability

    The assertions regarding the influence of cognitive biases on AI models are valid and reflect ongoing concerns in the field. However, the text would benefit from empirical data or case studies to substantiate claims about the impact of these biases on model performance. Providing specific examples of biases in AI systems and their consequences would enhance the reliability of the findings. Additionally, discussing any limitations of the study or potential biases in the research process itself would provide a more balanced perspective.


    Clarity and Structure

    The text is generally clear but could benefit from a more organized structure. Dividing the content into distinct sections—such as "Introduction," "Types of Cognitive Biases," "Impact on AI Systems," "Mitigation Strategies," and "Conclusion"—would improve readability and flow. Clearly defining key terms like "cognitive biases" and "egalitarian AI systems" would also make the content more accessible to a broader audience.


    Result Analysis

    The analysis of cognitive biases in AI systems is insightful but could be enriched by including specific statistical findings or illustrative examples that demonstrate the biases' effects on model performance. Discussing practical implications for industries that utilize AI—such as how bias mitigation strategies can be effectively implemented—would provide a clearer understanding of the significance of the study. Additionally, exploring future directions for research in this area, such as the role of regulatory frameworks or interdisciplinary approaches, could enhance the discussion and highlight ongoing challenges in achieving fair AI systems.

    Publisher Logo

    IJ Publication Publisher

    Thank You Sir

    Publisher

    IJ Publication

    IJ Publication

    Reviewer

    Phanindra Kumar

    Phanindra Kumar Kankanampati

    More Detail

    Category Icon

    Paper Category

    Computer Engineering

    Journal Icon

    Journal Name

    IJNRD - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT External Link

    Info Icon

    p-ISSN

    Info Icon

    e-ISSN

    2456-4184

    Subscribe us to get updated

    logo logo

    Scholar9 is aiming to empower the research community around the world with the help of technology & innovation. Scholar9 provides the required platform to Scholar for visibility & credibility.

    QUICKLINKS

    • What is Scholar9?
    • About Us
    • Mission Vision
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Blogs
    • FAQ

    CONTACT US

    • +91 82003 85143
    • hello@scholar9.com
    • www.scholar9.com

    © 2026 Sequence Research & Development Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

    whatsapp