Back to Top
Go Back
Journal Photo for Evaluation Review
Peer reviewed only Open Access

Evaluation Review (ER)

Publisher : SAGE Publications Inc.
Social Sciences Arts and Humanities
e-ISSN 1552-3926
p-ISSN 0193-841X
Issue Frequency Bi-Monthly
Impact Factor 2.6
Est. Year 1970
Mobile 01140539222
Country United States
Language English
APC YES
Impact Factor Assignee Google Scholar
Email evaluationrev@gmail.com

Journal Descriptions

Continuing the mission set by its founders Richard Berk and Howard Freeman in 1977, Evaluation Review aims to advance the practice of evaluation and to publish the results of high quality evaluations. Evaluation Review focuses on rigorous evaluation of public programs and policies across a range of types of evaluation (process, implementation, impact), policy areas, and academic disciplines, all to foster evidence-based policy. Impact evaluation—in particular, but not exclusively, random assignment—is an area of focus. Papers of interest include: (i) methodological discussions of the design and analysis of evaluations, including surveys of current practice and emerging issues; (ii) results of evaluations, especially when the evaluation develops new methods or applies emerging methods; and (iii) broader perspectives on evaluation, such as the role of rigorous impact evaluation in the broader evaluation context; contracting for and disseminating results of evaluations; and the interrelation of evaluation and policy.

Evaluation Review (ER) is :-

  • International, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Refereed, Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities , Online or Print , Bi-Monthly Journal

  • UGC Approved, ISSN Approved: P-ISSN P-ISSN: 0193-841X, E-ISSN: 1552-3926, Established: 1970, Impact Factor: 2.6
  • Does Not Provide Crossref DOI
  • Not indexed in Scopus, WoS, DOAJ, PubMed, UGC CARE

Indexing

Publications of ER

Stephen G. West August, 1990
The validity of true experiments is threatened by a class of self-report biases that affect all respondents at pretest but which are diminished by treatment, yielding noncomparable treated a...
Stephen G. West April, 1998
The authors assessed the impact of three designs (randomized experiment, nonequivalent control group design, regression discontinuity design) on estimates of effect size of a university-leve...