Back to Top
Visit Website

Evaluation Review (ER)

Publisher :

SAGE Publications Inc.

Scopus Profile
Peer reviewed only
Scopus Profile
Open Access
  • Social Sciences
  • Arts and Humanities
e-ISSN :

1552-3926

Issue Frequency :

Bi-Monthly

Impact Factor :

2.6

p-ISSN :

0193-841X

Est. Year :

1970

Mobile :

01140539222

Country :

United States

Language :

English

APC :

YES

Impact Factor Assignee :

Google Scholar

Email :

evaluationrev@gmail.com

Journal Descriptions

Continuing the mission set by its founders Richard Berk and Howard Freeman in 1977, Evaluation Review aims to advance the practice of evaluation and to publish the results of high quality evaluations. Evaluation Review focuses on rigorous evaluation of public programs and policies across a range of types of evaluation (process, implementation, impact), policy areas, and academic disciplines, all to foster evidence-based policy. Impact evaluation—in particular, but not exclusively, random assignment—is an area of focus. Papers of interest include: (i) methodological discussions of the design and analysis of evaluations, including surveys of current practice and emerging issues; (ii) results of evaluations, especially when the evaluation develops new methods or applies emerging methods; and (iii) broader perspectives on evaluation, such as the role of rigorous impact evaluation in the broader evaluation context; contracting for and disseminating results of evaluations; and the interrelation of evaluation and policy.


Evaluation Review (ER) is :

International, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Refereed, Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities , Online or Print, Bi-Monthly Journal

UGC Approved, ISSN Approved: P-ISSN - 0193-841X, E-ISSN - 1552-3926, Established in - 1970, Impact Factor - 2.6

Not Provide Crossref DOI

Not indexed in Scopus, WoS, DOAJ, PubMed, UGC CARE

Indexing

Scopus Profile
ISSN Portal

Publications of ER

  • dott image August, 1990

Invalidity of True Experiments: Self-Report Pretest Biases

The validity of true experiments is threatened by a class of self-report biases that affect all respondents at pretest but which are diminished by treatment, yielding noncomparable treated a...

  • dott image April, 1998

Comparison of a Randomized and Two Quasi-Experimental Designs in a Single Outcome Evaluation: Efficacy of a University-Level Remedial Writing Program

The authors assessed the impact of three designs (randomized experiment, nonequivalent control group design, regression discontinuity design) on estimates of effect size of a university-leve...

Establish Your Own Journal Without the Expense!

OJSCloud offers a complete, free setup to get you publishing.

Start Your Free Journal!
free profile