Paper Title

The Utility of Risk Assessment Instruments for the Prediction of Recidivism in Sexual Homicide Perpetrators

Keywords

  • Sexual Homicide Offenders
  • Risk Assessment Instruments
  • PCL-R
  • HCR-20
  • SVR-20
  • Static-99
  • Predictive Accuracy
  • Recidivism
  • Sexual Recidivism
  • Nonsexual Violent Recidivism
  • Forensic Psychiatric Reports
  • Criminal Recidivism
  • Follow-Up Information
  • Subgroup of Sexual Offenders
  • Retrospective Study
  • Small Sample Size
  • Forensic Risk Assessment
  • Sexually Motivated Homicides
  • Predictive Power
  • Criminal Records
  • Study Limitations
  • Risk Instrument Validity

Article Type

Research Article

Research Impact Tools

publications
27
supporting
0
mentioning
10
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
27
0
10
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Issue

Volume : 27 | Issue : 18 | Page No : 3553-3578

Published On

May, 2012

Downloads

Abstract

To examine the predictive accuracy of four well established risk assessment instruments (PCL-R, HCR-20, SVR-20, and Static-99) in an important subgroup of sexual offenders, these instruments were assessed retrospectively based on information from forensic psychiatric court reports in a sample of 90 released male sexual homicide offenders (out of an original sample of 166) in Germany. Follow-up information about criminal reconvictions after release were obtained from the federal criminal records. Total scores as well as subscales and single items of these risk assessment instruments did not predict sexual recidivism, and only some of them had moderate predictive power regarding nonsexual violent recidivism. Possible explanations for these unexpected results are the retrospective study design with missing information about influences during the long duration of detention and time after release, the small sample size as well as the possibility that the risk assessment instruments investigated were valid for general sex offender samples, but not for the particular subgroup of offenders with sexually motivated homicides.

View more >>