Go Back Research Article February, 2015

Religiosity, sexual myths, sex taboos, and pornography use: A cross-national comparison of Polish and German university students

Abstract

The study aimed to compare pornography use of students in two culturally different European countries – Poland and Germany, and to investigate associations with religiosity, sexual myths, and sex taboos. Data were collected in an online survey among German (n = 1303) and Polish (n = 1135) university students aged 18-26 years. Polish students were more religious, showed a greater acceptance of sexual myths, and reported a higher level of sex taboos in their origin families. Polish students were younger at their first contact with pornography, while German students used pornographic materials more often. Results suggested a link between sociocultural background, especially religiosity, and pornography engagement. The relationship between pornography use and religiosity was ambiguous. On the one hand, attending church was negatively associated with age at first contact and pornography use. On the other hand, the association of intrinsic religiosity with pornography use proved to be contradictory: it was correlated with a lower frequency of pornography use for females and with a higher frequency for males. The agreement with common sexual myths was related to a higher frequency of pornography use. There was no association between the level of sex taboos and pornography use.

Keywords

Pornography Sexually Explicit Materials Sexual Socialization Religiosity Young Adults Sexual Myths Sex Taboos Cultural Differences Poland Germany University Students Sociocultural Background Sexual Behavior Church Attendance Intrinsic Religiosity First Contact with Pornography Frequency of Pornography Use Gender Differences Sexual Beliefs Family Influence Sexual Education Online Survey University Population Sexual Attitudes Psychological Impact Sexual Exploration Media Influence
Document Preview
Download PDF
Details
Volume 9
Issue 2
Pages 1-16
ISSN 1802-7962
Impact Metrics