Real-world assessment of the treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma across different risk stratification criteria in the United States: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

This study evaluated prognostic performance of International Staging System (ISS), revised ISS, and chromosomal abnormalities (CA) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients to describe treatment patterns (cohort 1; n = 1979) and survival outcomes (cohort 2; n = 1382). In both cohorts, ∼18%, 41%, and 37% of patients were high-risk according to the R-ISS, ISS, and high-risk CA criteria, respectively. Across all risk stratification criteria, 60% of patients received triplets. In cohort 2, the median modified progression-free survival decreased with each increasing risk stage (23.5, 12.1, and 8.8 months in R-ISS I, II, and III, respectively, and 16.0, 12.7, and 10.4 months in ISS I, II, and III). Similar trends were observed in the proportions of two-year overall survival. In conclusion, R-ISS has greater discriminatory power than ISS or high-risk CA alone and can be implemented in a real-world setting. Accordingly, a more risk-adapted approach can be feasible, with a greater population-level impact.