Go Back Research Article May, 1999

Patterns of sexual partnerships among adolescent females

Abstract

Objective: To develop a multidimensional classification of sexual partnerships. Methods: Eighty-two female subjects (ages 15–20 years; 77% African American) used coital logs to record dates of 1265 coital events, partner initials, and condom use. Logs were collected at 1-, 3-, 9-, 15-, and 21-month return visits. Three adolescent health professionals independently classified partnership patterns of each subject; classification schemes were revised until complete consensus for each subject was obtained. Results: Complete agreement in partnership classification was reached after 3 rounds. The consensus partnership classification had three dimensions: number (1, ≥2 partners), pattern (1 partner, serially exclusive, concurrent), and duration (any partnership ≤21 days, all partnerships >21 days). A total of 34 of 82 (34%) of subjects had ≥2 partners; 11 of 34 (32%) had concurrent partnerships. Twenty of 82 (24%) had only partnerships lasting >21 days. Condom use was less common for subjects in only longer-term (>21 days) partnerships, but did not significantly vary by number or pattern. Conclusion: Multiple dimensions of adolescent sexual partnerships may be identified. Detailed research and clinical assessments along these dimensions may improve understanding of protective behaviors such as condom use.

Keywords

adolescent sexual partnerships sexual relationship patterns coital events partner dynamics serial monogamy concurrent partnerships condom use sexual health sti prevention risk assessment adolescent sexual behavior relationship duration sexual networks partner variation public health sexual risk protective behaviors adolescent health sexual activity tracking coital logs behavioral patterns safe sex practices youth sexuality epidemiology of stis health disparities sexual decision-making sexual behavior sexually transmitted diseases sexuality risk behavior
Document Preview
Download PDF
Details
Volume 24
Issue 5
Pages 300–303
ISSN 1879-1972
Impact Metrics