Back to Top

Paper Title

Glofitamab results in cost savings versus epcoritamab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a total cost of care analysisFootnote‡

Keywords

  • relapsed/refractory
  • dlbcl
  • cost analysis
  • epcoritamab
  • bispecifics
  • glofitamab

Article Type

Research Article

Research Impact Tools

Issue

| Page No : 1-8

Published On

April, 2025

Downloads

Abstract

Fixed-treatment duration glofitamab and treat-to-progression epcoritamab are approved in the US for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥2 prior therapies. An economic model was developed to estimate the per-patient total cost of care (TCC) for glofitamab versus epcoritamab from a US healthcare perspective. Treatment costs were based on time-to-off-treatment (glofitamab, NCT03075696) and progression-free survival (epcoritamab, NCT03625037). Per-patient cost savings, adjusted to 2023 US dollars, were observed with glofitamab versus epcoritamab across cycles 1–3 (−$56,275), and over 6 months (−$37,982), 1 year (−$68,195), 5 years (−$223,692), 10 years (−$325,175), and lifetime (−$503,075). While adverse event ($364) and treatment administration ($8,398) costs were higher for glofitamab versus epcoritamab, these were offset by consistently lower glofitamab treatment costs across all time horizons. Glofitamab showed per-patient TCC savings versus epcoritamab at every cumulative cycle and across all time horizons investigated, offering greater budget predictability and cost savings at the healthcare system and population levels.

View more >>

Uploded Document Preview