Back to Top

Paper Title

“The relevance of a coherent forensic assessment and treatment process”: big deal or old wine in a leaky bottle?

Keywords

  • Forensic psychiatry
  • DSM-5
  • ICD-10
  • ICD-11
  • diagnostic systems
  • forensic psychiatric assessment
  • forensic case work
  • FOTRES system
  • Swiss Federal Supreme Court
  • forensic diagnosis
  • psychiatric terminology
  • law and medicine intersection
  • delinquent behavior pathologization
  • diagnostic feasibility
  • forensic psychiatry standards
  • clinical assessment

Article Type

Research Article

Research Impact Tools

Issue

Volume : 14 | Issue : 2 | Page No : 212–219

Published On

March, 2020

Downloads

Abstract

In their article “The relevance of a coherent process of assessment and treatment: boundaries of general psychiatric diagnostic systems ICD and DSM for forensic case work” Borchard and Gerth (2020) argue for a separate diagnostic system in forensic psychiatry. The authors of this article evaluate this proposal and demonstrate why the call for a forensic psychiatric diagnostic system beyond DSM‑5 and ICD-10/ICD-11 cannot be followed. A separate diagnosis and disorder terminology that would be specific for forensic psychiatry is neither necessary nor feasible to sensibly implement at the intersection of law and medicine. Instead, terminological difficulties as well as the risk of pathologizing delinquent behavior would be imminent if the proposal by Borchard and Gerth was put into practice. These problems are highlighted with respect to decisions of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court and with respect to the FOTRES system that Borchard and Gerth recommend.

View more >>

Uploded Document Preview